Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:40:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:40:36 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:16855 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:40:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:50:42 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Mike Anderson cc: Patrick Mochel , linux-kernel Subject: Re: Bug with (maybe not *in*) sysfs Message-ID: <33870000.1046044241@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <20030223234517.GA3158@beaverton.ibm.com> References: <5480000.1046028715@[10.10.2.4]> <20030223202401.GA1452@beaverton.ibm.com> <12070000.1046032398@[10.10.2.4]> <20030223234517.GA3158@beaverton.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 691 Lines: 19 >> OK, so two similar, but not identical cards using the same driver? >> First patch mentioned looks very simple, but won't apply to 2.5.62 > > Are you seeing this problem on 2.5.62? The registration problem I > described should be gone in 2.5.62. Yup. But I can't see it now we avoided a VM bug ... maybe it was indirect fallout from that ... sorry. If it's still happening, and I just missed it, will let you know. Thanks for the help, M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/