Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 21:58:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 21:58:40 -0500 Received: from palrel10.hp.com ([156.153.255.245]:36058 "EHLO palrel10.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 21:58:39 -0500 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15961.36033.742869.102262@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 19:08:49 -0800 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, David Lang , Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call In-Reply-To: References: <15961.33856.876529.568807@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 874 Lines: 24 >>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:54:41 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds said: Linus> In other words, the P4 eats the Itanium for breakfast even if Linus> you limit it to 2GHz due to some "process" rule. Ugh, 842 vs 810 is "eating for breakfast"? In my lexicon, that's "in the same ballpark". Besides the 2GHz Xeon MP is a 0.13um part. >> You claimed that x86 is inherently superior. I provided data that >> shows that much of this apparent superiority is simply an effect of >> the larger volume that x86 achieves today. Linus> And I showed that your data is flawed. No, you did not. --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/