Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032809AbbKDSn7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2015 13:43:59 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:33796 "EHLO mail-pa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031688AbbKDSny (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2015 13:43:54 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 10:43:50 -0800 From: Eduardo Valentin To: Srinivas Pandruvada Cc: Jacob Pan , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Arjan van de Ven , Paul Turner , Len Brown , Tim Chen , Andi Kleen , Rafael Wysocki Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] CFS idle injection Message-ID: <20151104184348.GA12825@localhost.localdomain> References: <1446509428-5616-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20151104060654.GC8850@localhost.localdomain> <20151104085830.010e69f8@yairi> <1446656752.7814.119.camel@spandruv-desk3.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1446656752.7814.119.camel@spandruv-desk3.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2425 Lines: 70 Hello Jacob, Srinivas, On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 09:05:52AM -0800, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote: > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 08:58 -0800, Jacob Pan wrote: > > > > I have two choices for this code: > > > > 1) be part of existing powerclamp driver but require exporting some > > > > sched APIs. > > > > 2) be part of sched since the genernal rule applies when it comes > > > > down to sycnhronized idle time for best power savings. > > > > > > > > The patches below are for #2. There is a known problem with LOW RES > > > > timer mode that I am working on. But I am hoping to get review > > > > earlier. > > > > > > > > > > I also like #2 too. Specially now that it is not limited to a specific > > > platform. One question though, could you still keep the cooling device > > > support of it? In some systems, it might make sense to enable / > > > disable idle injections based on temperature. > > > > > One of the key difference between 1 and 2 is that #2 is open loop > > control, since we don't have CPU c-states info baked into scheduler. To > > close the loop, perhaps we can export some internal APIs to the thermal > > subsystem then the thermal governors can pick the condition to inject > > idle. Jacob, I also like this direction. Having the proper APIs exported, creating a cooling device that use them would be natural path. Then, one could create a thermal zone plugging a governor and the idle injection cooling device that uses the exported APIs. > > > Was there any particular reason you dropped the cooling device > > > support? > > > > > I did sysctl instead of thermal sysfs to conform the rest of the sched > > tuning knobs. We could also have a proxy cooling device to call > > internal APIs mentioned above. Agreed here then. > I think we should have cooling device as we are already using this > cooling device. Once it pass RFC stage,I think we should consider add > this. Srinivas, Yes, that seens to be a good path to follow. Thanks. > Thanks, > Srinivas > > > > Another reason is that, I intend to extend beyond thermal. Where we can > > consolidate/sync idle work in semi-active and balanced workload. I see. BR, Eduardo Valentin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/