Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030974AbbKDWIe (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:08:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37970 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965786AbbKDWIc (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:08:32 -0500 From: mchristi@redhat.com To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Subject: [RESEND RFC PATCH 00/32] separate operations from flags in the bio/request structs Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 16:07:57 -0600 Message-Id: <1446674909-5371-1-git-send-email-mchristi@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2069 Lines: 50 This is just a resend of the patchset from earlier today. There was a error in the middle of sending the set, so it looks like 10 - 32 got dropped. There are a couple new block layer commands we are trying to add support for in the near term: compare and write http://www.spinics.net/lists/target-devel/msg07826.html copy offload/extended copy/xcopy https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2014-July/msg00070.html The problem is if we contine to add more commands we will have to one day extend the cmd_flags/bi_rw fields again. To prevent that, this patchset separates the operation (REQ_WRITE, REQ_DISCARD, REQ_WRITE_SAME, etc) from the flags (REQ_SYNC, REQ_QUIET, etc) in the bio and request structs. In the end of this set, we will have two fields bio->bi_op/request->op and bio->bi_rw/request->cmd_flags. The patches were made against Jens's linux-block tree's for-linus branch: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/log/?h=for-linus (last commit a22c4d7e34402ccdf3414f64c50365436eba7b93). I have done some basic testing for a lot of the drivers and filesystems, but I wanted to get comments before trying to track down more hardware/ systems for testing. Known issues: - REQ_FLUSH is still a flag, but should probably be a operation. For lower level drivers like SCSI where we only get a flush, it makes more sense to be a operation. However, upper layers like filesystems can send down flushes with writes, so it is more of a flag for them. I am still working on this. - There is a regression with the dm flakey target. It currently cannot corrupt the operation values. - The patchset is a little awkward. It touches so much code, but I wanted to maintain git bisectibility, so there is lots of compat code left around until the last patches where everyting is cleaned up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/