Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1032997AbbKEJAu (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 04:00:50 -0500 Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:56442 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030521AbbKEJAs (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 04:00:48 -0500 X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-f794b6d000001495-7b-563b1abd3716 From: Pavel Fedin To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "'Rob Herring'" , "'Pawel Moll'" , "'Mark Rutland'" , "'Ian Campbell'" , "'Kumar Gala'" , "'Kukjin Kim'" References: <5639B588.1080901@samsung.com> <000b01d1179f$ed5032b0$c7f09810$@samsung.com> <563B0E4D.6020808@samsung.com> <001a01d117a6$3aed1140$b0c733c0$@samsung.com> <563B189D.4080907@samsung.com> In-reply-to: <563B189D.4080907@samsung.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/4] Exynos SROMc configuration and Ethernet support for SMDK5410 Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 12:00:43 +0300 Message-id: <001c01d117a8$74d70c10$5e852430$@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQInd0NHxwReN7LBFLXzkPqpXKHCoQH0fVC9Af2o1D4BgF4w4gE4Cp0DAi4dS3WdmZuSIA== Content-language: ru X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprPIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7p7pazDDNruSVjMP3KO1aL/zUJW i3OvVjJavH5haNH/+DWzxabH11gtLu+aw2Yx4/w+Joul1y8yWUyYvpbFonXvEXYHbo8189Yw elzu62XyWLn8C5vHplWdbB6bl9R79G1ZxejxeZNcAHsUl01Kak5mWWqRvl0CV8a5K4eYCxYJ VZx7/46lgfEIXxcjJ4eEgInEy7+/mCBsMYkL99azdTFycQgJLGWUuNL4ix3C+c4oMWnvVEaQ KjYBdYnTXz+wgCREBHYxSvza0g3mMAu8YZQ4tewxM0TLV0aJKS9egrVwCmhL9E7aC2YLC0RJ TLy6nhnEZhFQlXgz7yI7iM0rYClx9841RghbUOLH5HssIDazgJbE+p3HmSBseYnNa94yQxyr ILHj7GuwehGBCImfp09C1YhITPt3j3kCo9AsJKNmIRk1C8moWUhaFjCyrGIUTS1NLihOSs81 0itOzC0uzUvXS87P3cQIibavOxiXHrM6xCjAwajEw2tQbRUmxJpYVlyZe4hRgoNZSYS3+DtQ iDclsbIqtSg/vqg0J7X4EKM0B4uSOO/MXe9DhATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDYynVn5Kb69f WNozuXeGYaLNXtlS1cl7M0/M+xW895ztPJsprbVLLXdZ1wudPLprgQPDlPlybx7eff5ROLKC ZU+p0NmL6cwX+MP4V77ULg+UaRevag2Y9zqYnedc1cavIm0HDhp0ztghrWYlWqK+jimvYUNJ 95XUhcePanMetLVeXLng6a8fB0uVWIozEg21mIuKEwE/tP5XsgIAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2526 Lines: 63 Hello! > >>>>> This patchset also depends on Exynos 5410 pinctrl support, introduced by > >>>>> patches 0003 and 0004 from this set: > >>>>> [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: EXYNOS: ODROID-XU DT and LEDs > >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html > >>>> > >>>> Only the first patch made up to kernel. The rest (2-5) received feedback > >>>> and I am waiting for fixing it. Andreas apparently loose the interest... > >>> > >>> I have rechecked the original thread on archives and found nothing new. Where can > >>> i read those feedbacks? Perhaps it makes sense for me to pick them up and include > >>> into my set. > >> > >> Go ahead. The only waiting feedback is at patch 2/5: > >> > >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330910.html > >> Javier's pointed use of linux,stdout-path and putting xxti in > >> exynos5410.dtsi (and customizing it per board if needed). > >> > >> Patches already got reviews and acks so only 2/5 is the stopper. > > > > Ah, it's odroidXU device tree. Sorry, i don't have this particular board, and my patch > actually doesn't need it. I could do some > > blind modifications, but cannot test them, and this is out of my scope at all. > > As mentioned in the commit msg, i need only 0003 and 0004 from there. Can they be picked up > independently? They don't need 0002 by > > themselves, only 0005 needs it. > > Indeed the order of patches is messed up and this makes the confusion. I > was waiting for resend of entire patchset but you are right - this is > not required. 3 and 4 can be applied independently. > > If they apply, I will pick up them after merge window. They should. I have quite recent linux-next tree, i've just checked, 0003 applies with a small fuzz and 0004 applies without problems at all. > If they don't, they will need rebasing by someone. Maybe you can take > care of them? Of course. Please notify me if rebasing will be needed, i'll do it. > You have the SMDK5410 for testing, right? Of course. And you can already get my Tested-by: Pavel Fedin on those two because my experimental tree already uses them, and everything works quite well. Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/