Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161691AbbKEPAQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:00:16 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:35346 "EHLO mail-oi0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032952AbbKEPAK (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 10:00:10 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <563B6A4B.7090400@codeaurora.org> References: <1445961999-9506-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <1445961999-9506-6-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <563AE588.1080009@roeck-us.net> <563B5DF9.6080102@codeaurora.org> <563B62F7.3050307@codeaurora.org> <563B6A4B.7090400@codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 23:00:09 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v8 5/5] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver From: Fu Wei To: Timur Tabi Cc: Guenter Roeck , Linaro ACPI Mailman List , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lkml , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Jon Masters , Pratyush Anand , Will Deacon , Wim Van Sebroeck , Catalin Marinas , Wei Fu , Rob Herring , Vipul Gandhi , Dave Young Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1758 Lines: 60 Hi Timur, On 5 November 2015 at 22:40, Timur Tabi wrote: > Fu Wei wrote: >> >> Did you really read the "Note" above???????? OK, let me paste it again >> and again: >> >> SBSA 2.3 Page 23 : >> If a larger watch period is required then the compare value can be >> programmed directly into the compare value register. > > > Well, okay. Sorry, I should have read what you pasted more closely. But I Thanks for reading it again. > think that means during initialization, not during the WS0 timeout. I really don't see SBSA say "during initialization, not during the WS0 timeout", please point it out the page number and the line number in SBSA spec. maybe I miss it? Thanks for your help in advance. > > Anyway, I still don't like the fact that you're programming WCV in the "you don't like" doesn't mean "it is wrong" or "we can't do this", so I will keep this way unless we have better idea to extend second stage timeout. > interrupt handler, but I'm not going to make a big deal about it any more. Deal, Thanks a lot. > > > -- > Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the > Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct) Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile) Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15, One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District, Shanghai,China 200021 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/