Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751278AbbKETTW (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 14:19:22 -0500 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:42572 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbbKETTU (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2015 14:19:20 -0500 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Douglas Anderson Cc: John Youn , balbi@ti.com, Yunzhi Li , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Julius Werner , gregory.herrero@intel.com, yousaf.kaukab@intel.com, dinguyen@opensource.altera.com, johnyoun@synopsys.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dwc2: Speed up the interrupt handler quite a bit Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 20:18:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4257088.ij6Pk572Sd@phil> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.2.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.14.13; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1446677585-28582-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> References: <1446677585-28582-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1602 Lines: 30 Am Mittwoch, 4. November 2015, 14:53:02 schrieb Douglas Anderson: > The dwc2 interrupt handler is quite slow. On rk3288 with a few things > plugged into the ports and with cpufreq locked at 696MHz (to simulate > real world idle system), I can easily observe dwc2_handle_hcd_intr() > taking > 120 us, sometimes > 150 us. Note that SOF interrupts come > every 125 us with high speed USB, so taking > 120 us in the interrupt > handler is a big deal. > > The patches here will speed up the interrupt controller significantly. > After this series, I have a hard time seeing the interrupt controller > taking > 20 us and I don't ever see it taking > 30 us ever in my tests > unless I bring the cpufreq back down. With the cpufreq at 126 MHz I can > still see the interrupt handler take > 50 us, so I'm sure we could > improve this further. ...but hey, it's a start. > > In addition to the speedup, this series also has the advantage of > simplifying dwc2 and making it more like everyone else (introducing the > possibility of future simplifications). Picking this series up will > help your diffstat and likely win you friends. ;) I gave this a simple spin on my veyron-pinky with both a device attached directly to the port as well as with an usb-hub in between. Everything was still working smoothly, so Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/