Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 17:35:58 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option
Message-ID: <20151106173558.GC7637@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <1446658671-16238-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org>
 <20151106123008.GK6087@arm.com>
 <20151106125002.GA8116@leverpostej>
 <20151106162109.GZ7637@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20151106162538.GU6087@arm.com>
 <563CE21A.6060803@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <563CE21A.6060803@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 764
Lines: 20

On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 09:23:38AM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote:
> On 11/6/2015 8:25 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >However, the patch would allow one to
> >disable FRAME_POINTERS (not sure it has any effect on the aarch64 gcc
> >though).
> 
> No, it doesn't. Actually, FRAME_POINTER could be disabled regardless of the
> patch.

In which case I suggest that we always select it just as a clearer
statement that the feature cannot be disabled (and you never know what
the compiler people decide to do in the future).

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/