Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:15:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:15:29 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:14853 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:15:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:20:33 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Alan Cox cc: Andreas Schwab , Jeff Garzik , "Richard B. Johnson" , Martin Schwidefsky , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390 (7/13): gcc 3.3 adaptions. In-Reply-To: <1046132400.2216.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 711 Lines: 20 On 25 Feb 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 22:39, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > And yes, gcc could do the work necessary to only give the warning if it > > actually has reason to believe that the code is wrong. As it is, it gives > > the warning for code that is good. > > gcc gives the warning only when you ask it to annoy you. Seems a good trade off. That _used_ to be true. Look at the subject line. gcc-3.3 gives the warning for -Wall. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/