Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:08:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:08:58 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:16769 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:08:57 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390 (7/13): gcc 3.3 adaptions. From: Alan Cox To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andreas Schwab , Jeff Garzik , "Richard B. Johnson" , Martin Schwidefsky , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1046132400.2216.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 25 Feb 2003 00:20:01 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 681 Lines: 14 On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 22:39, Linus Torvalds wrote: > And yes, gcc could do the work necessary to only give the warning if it > actually has reason to believe that the code is wrong. As it is, it gives > the warning for code that is good. gcc gives the warning only when you ask it to annoy you. Seems a good trade off. There are about 15 bug fixes in 2.4.21-pre4ac4,ac5,ac6 solely from that, all real bugs and some very non obvious - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/