Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1163093AbbKFUhT (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:37:19 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:34573 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1162346AbbKFUhP (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2015 15:37:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 21:37:09 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Waiman Long Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Scott J Norton , Douglas Hatch , Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v9 6/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Queue node adaptive spinning Message-ID: <20151106203709.GD17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1446247597-61863-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <1446247597-61863-7-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <20151106150149.GV17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <563CE93E.6090000@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <563CE93E.6090000@hpe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1255 Lines: 34 On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:54:06PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > >>+static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, struct mcs_spinlock *prev) > >> { > >> struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node; > >>+ struct pv_node *pp = (struct pv_node *)prev; > >> int waitcnt = 0; > >> int loop; > >>+ bool wait_early; > >> > >> /* waitcnt processing will be compiled out if !QUEUED_LOCK_STAT */ > >> for (;; waitcnt++) { > >>- for (loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD; loop; loop--) { > >>+ for (wait_early = false, loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD; loop; loop--) { > >> if (READ_ONCE(node->locked)) > >> return; > >>+ if (pv_wait_early(pp, loop)) { > >>+ wait_early = true; > >>+ break; > >>+ } > >> cpu_relax(); > >> } > >> > >So if prev points to another node, it will never see vcpu_running. Was > >that fully intended? > > I had added code in pv_wait_head_or_lock to set the state appropriately for > the queue head vCPU. Yes, but that's the head, for nodes we'll always have halted or hashed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/