Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752386AbbKIBlB (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2015 20:41:01 -0500 Received: from helcar.hengli.com.au ([209.40.204.226]:41280 "EHLO helcar.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752029AbbKIBk6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2015 20:40:58 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 09:40:45 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Maciej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBenczykowski?= , Tom Herbert , Jiri Benc , Netdev , LKML Subject: Re: GSO with udp_tunnel_xmit_skb Message-ID: <20151109014045.GA1358@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20151108105710.GA30282@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 843 Lines: 20 On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 03:57:24PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Herbert Xu wrote: > > UDP carries no ordering information so this doesn't work. > > But if there's no ordering information, what's the problem? Isn't it > good enough to send the packets in the order they were sendto()d? Or > in any order at all? You're right. I don't think the ordering matters. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/