Subject: Re: kdbus refactoring?
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
References: <CAFLxGvwQmt+v+Dh05SC-HrLTcQxT0-n6T33qXpvXhKBQsk-u3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151108213526.GB942@kroah.com>
 <CAFLxGvxVOFpGiX+xwj0gsRTM6+sPjcmUED9cjecJCKq5aBGdpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151108233018.GA1852@kroah.com> <20151109005335.GA25322@x>
 <CANq1E4QmdCWMA8qJ-6ROsyfGxgLocprsurUnfwuyYBf_YoR+nw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151109084813.GD7520@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CANq1E4RLYV1jmW+hO0rBAaUD=fTgnqrmcqt3uYkLpjNS1bMHqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151109091430.GE7520@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CANq1E4R_am38hXZO8EtybdHKigiSowr=YsZWM-+SKKT_N=UqYA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>,
        Havoc Pennington <havoc.pennington@gmail.com>
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Message-ID: <5640674A.4030602@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 10:28:42 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CANq1E4R_am38hXZO8EtybdHKigiSowr=YsZWM-+SKKT_N=UqYA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1057
Lines: 29

Am 09.11.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Herrmann:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:56:04AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
>>
>>> The submission and following year of development followed the 'kernel
>>> way'.
>>
>> This is not true; the last complete posting I could find was:
>>
>>   Date: Mon,  9 Mar 2015 14:09:06 +0100
>>   Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add kdbus implementation
> 
> ..which was the last time we proposed it for inclusion.

Guys, let's cool down. :-)

What Peter is complaining about is that since the last proposal a lot
of iterative patches and even pull requests were sent instead of
complete patch series.
The expectation was that you send patch series with fixes folded in
as long the review takes.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/