Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 01:07:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 01:07:04 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:49866 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 01:07:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:17:05 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Chris Wedgwood , Alan Cox cc: Larry McVoy , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call Message-ID: <13760000.1046153824@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <20030225051956.GA18302@f00f.org> References: <1510000.1045942974@[10.10.2.4]> <20030222195642.GI1407@work.bitmover.com> <2080000.1045947731@[10.10.2.4]> <20030222231552.GA31268@work.bitmover.com> <3610000.1045957443@[10.10.2.4]> <20030224045616.GB4215@work.bitmover.com> <48940000.1046063797@[10.10.2.4]> <20030224065826.GA5665@work.bitmover.com> <1046093309.1246.6.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030225051956.GA18302@f00f.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 594 Lines: 17 >> _If_ it harms performance on small boxes. > > You mean like the general slowdown from 2.4 - >2.5? > > It seems to me for small boxes, 2.5.x is margianlly slower at most > things than 2.4.x. Can you name a benchmark, or at least do something reproducible between versions, and produce a 2.4 vs 2.5 profile? Let's at least try to fix it ... M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/