Subject: Re: kdbus refactoring?
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
References: <20151108213526.GB942@kroah.com>
 <CAFLxGvxVOFpGiX+xwj0gsRTM6+sPjcmUED9cjecJCKq5aBGdpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151108233018.GA1852@kroah.com> <20151109005335.GA25322@x>
 <CANq1E4QmdCWMA8qJ-6ROsyfGxgLocprsurUnfwuyYBf_YoR+nw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151109084813.GD7520@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CANq1E4RLYV1jmW+hO0rBAaUD=fTgnqrmcqt3uYkLpjNS1bMHqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151109091430.GE7520@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <CANq1E4R_am38hXZO8EtybdHKigiSowr=YsZWM-+SKKT_N=UqYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5640674A.4030602@nod.at> <20151109150249.GA8745@kroah.com>
Cc: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@opendz.org>,
        Havoc Pennington <havoc.pennington@gmail.com>
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Message-ID: <5640C20D.8000009@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:55:57 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20151109150249.GA8745@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1665
Lines: 40

Am 09.11.2015 um 16:02 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:28:42AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Am 09.11.2015 um 10:19 schrieb David Herrmann:
>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:56:04AM +0100, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The submission and following year of development followed the 'kernel
>>>>> way'.
>>>>
>>>> This is not true; the last complete posting I could find was:
>>>>
>>>>   Date: Mon,  9 Mar 2015 14:09:06 +0100
>>>>   Subject: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add kdbus implementation
>>>
>>> ..which was the last time we proposed it for inclusion.
>>
>> Guys, let's cool down. :-)
>>
>> What Peter is complaining about is that since the last proposal a lot
>> of iterative patches and even pull requests were sent instead of
>> complete patch series.
>> The expectation was that you send patch series with fixes folded in
>> as long the review takes.
> 
> And that will happen, when the code is ready, nothing different is
> happening here from any other code submission.  I don't know why people
> somehow think we don't know how to do this whole thing, it's as if they
> don't trust us, which is sad.

Well, what me makes sad is that my little question ended up in a flame.
If someone asks me how I plan to solve something I'm become proud and tell my ideas.
All I got was rejection and platitudes.

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/