Message-ID: <5640E300.2000001@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 10:16:32 -0800
From: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
CC: will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] arm64: cleanup FRAME_POINTER kconfig option and
 force to select it
References: <1447091037-11434-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org> <20151109181422.GE21606@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20151109181422.GE21606@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 971
Lines: 30

On 11/9/2015 10:14 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:43:55AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>> According to the discussion on the mailing list, this version adds a new patch
>> to force select FRAME_POINTER for ARM64.
>>
>> Change v2 --> v1:
>> 1. Adds a new patch to force select FRAME_POINTER
>> 2. Notes that this change adds a dependency on DEBUG_KERNEL for building with
>> frame pointers
>>
>>
>> Yang Shi (2):
>>        arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option
>>        arm64: force to select FRAME_POINTER
>
> Do you really need two patches for this?

I just thought it may be clearer in this way. If nobody thinks it is 
necessary, I definitely could merge them into one.

Thanks,
Yang

>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/