Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:20:55 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] arm64: cleanup FRAME_POINTER kconfig option and
 force to select it
Message-ID: <20151109182055.GF21606@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
References: <1447091037-11434-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org>
 <20151109181422.GE21606@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
 <5640E300.2000001@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5640E300.2000001@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1080
Lines: 30

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 10:16:32AM -0800, Shi, Yang wrote:
> On 11/9/2015 10:14 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:43:55AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> >>According to the discussion on the mailing list, this version adds a new patch
> >>to force select FRAME_POINTER for ARM64.
> >>
> >>Change v2 --> v1:
> >>1. Adds a new patch to force select FRAME_POINTER
> >>2. Notes that this change adds a dependency on DEBUG_KERNEL for building with
> >>frame pointers
> >>
> >>
> >>Yang Shi (2):
> >>       arm64: remove redundant FRAME_POINTER kconfig option
> >>       arm64: force to select FRAME_POINTER
> >
> >Do you really need two patches for this?
> 
> I just thought it may be clearer in this way. If nobody thinks it is
> necessary, I definitely could merge them into one.

Please merge them into one.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/