Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:40:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:40:02 -0500 Received: from mta.sara.nl ([145.100.16.144]:60667 "EHLO mta.sara.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:40:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:50:10 +0100 From: Remco Post To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: zImage now holds vmlinux, System.map and config in sections. (fwd) Message-Id: <20030225135010.69f9f58f.r.post@sara.nl> In-Reply-To: <20030225113557.C9257@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <3C6BEE8B5E1BAC42905A93F13004E8AB017DE84C@mailse01.axis.se> <20030225092520.A9257@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20030225110704.GD159052@niksula.cs.hut.fi> <20030225113557.C9257@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-sun-solaris2.7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1891 Lines: 44 On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:35:57 +0000 Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:07:04PM +0200, Ville Herva wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:25:20AM +0000, you [Russell King] wrote: > > > Agreed - zImage is already around 1MB on many ARM machines, and since > > > loading zImage over a serial port using xmodem takes long enough > > > already, this is one silly feature I'll definitely keep out of the > > > ARM tree. > > > > Why not make it a config option (like the other (two? three?) rejected > > patches that implemented this did)? > > I, for one, do not see any point in trying to put more and more crap > into one file, when its perfectly easy to just use the "cp" command > to produce the same end result, namely a copy of zImage, System.map > and configuration, thusly: > > cp arch/$ARCH/boot/zImage /boot/vmlinuz-$VERSION > cp .config /boot/config-$VERSION > cp System.map /boot/System.map-$VERSION > Hmm, and how would you implement that on a system (ppc/prep) that could very easily netboot a kernel... no /boot needed? I for one build kernels on one box that is more or less production and netboot another just to see it fail horribly... having all stuff in one file could help.... -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Remco Post SARA - Stichting Academisch Rekencentrum Amsterdam http://www.sara.nl High Performance Computing Tel. +31 20 592 8008 Fax. +31 20 668 3167 "I really didn't foresee the Internet. But then, neither did the computer industry. Not that that tells us very much of course - the computer industry didn't even foresee that the century was going to end." -- Douglas Adams - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/