Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751636AbbKJHtc (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 02:49:32 -0500 Received: from mx2.parallels.com ([199.115.105.18]:57556 "EHLO mx2.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751066AbbKJHta (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 02:49:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:49:14 +0300 From: Vladimir Davydov To: Tejun Heo CC: Michal Hocko , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Greg Thelen , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] memcg/kmem: switch to white list policy Message-ID: <20151110074914.GQ31308@esperanza> References: <20151109140832.GE8916@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20151109182840.GJ31308@esperanza> <20151109185401.GB28507@mtj.duckdns.org> <20151109192747.GN31308@esperanza> <20151109193253.GC28507@mtj.duckdns.org> <20151109201218.GP31308@esperanza> <20151109203053.GD28507@mtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151109203053.GD28507@mtj.duckdns.org> X-ClientProxiedBy: US-EXCH.sw.swsoft.com (10.255.249.47) To US-EXCH2.sw.swsoft.com (10.255.249.46) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 734 Lines: 17 On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 03:30:53PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: ... > Hmm.... can't we simply merge among !SLAB_ACCOUNT and SLAB_ACCOUNT > kmem_caches within themselves? I don't think we'd be losing anything > by restricting merge at that level. For anything to be tagged > SLAB_ACCOUNT, it has to have a potential to grow enormous after all. OK, I'll prepare v2 which will introduce SLAB_ACCOUNT and add it to SLAB_MERGE_SAME. Let's see what slab maintainers think of it. Thanks, Vladimir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/