Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752817AbbKJMrq (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:47:46 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:35996 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751977AbbKJMrp (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:47:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:37:18 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Ingo Molnar Cc: X86 ML , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Andy Lutomirski , Herbert Xu , Matt Mackall , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used cpu_has_xx macros Message-ID: <20151110123718.GF19187@pd.tnic> References: <1447156122-9379-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <1447156122-9379-4-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <20151110123000.GA20227@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151110123000.GA20227@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 640 Lines: 23 On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:30:00PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: ... > It's entirely silent on the difference between static_cpu_has() and > static_cpu_has_safe() - what makes the second one 'safe'? Yeah, those really are lacking some more fleshy and detailed explanations. :-) I'll document those properly. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/