Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:07:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:07:03 -0500 Received: from [195.223.140.107] ([195.223.140.107]:51334 "EHLO athlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:07:02 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:17:27 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Andrew Morton Cc: Hanna Linder , lse-tech@lists.sf.et, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call Message-ID: <20030225171727.GN29467@dualathlon.random> References: <96700000.1045871294@w-hlinder> <20030222192424.6ba7e859.akpm@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030222192424.6ba7e859.akpm@digeo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 965 Lines: 26 On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 07:24:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > 2.4.21-pre4: 8.10 seconds > 2.5.62-mm3 with objrmap: 9.95 seconds (+1.85) > 2.5.62-mm3 without objrmap: 10.86 seconds (+0.91) > > Current 2.5 is 2.76 seconds slower, and this patch reclaims 0.91 of those > seconds. > > > So whole stole the remaining 1.85 seconds? Looks like pte_highmem. would you mind to add the line for 2.4.21-pre4aa3? it has pte-highmem so you can easily find it out for sure if it is pte_highmem that stole >10% of your fast cpu. A line for the 2.4-rmap patch would be also interesting. > Note one second spent in pte_alloc_one(). note the seconds spent in the rmap affected paths too. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/