Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751893AbbKJVHP (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:07:15 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:58134 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751131AbbKJVHO (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:07:14 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:07:06 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Waiman Long Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Scott J Norton , Douglas Hatch , Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/locking/core v10 6/7] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow limited lock stealing Message-ID: <20151110210706.GI17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1447114167-47185-1-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <1447114167-47185-7-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com> <20151110160343.GE17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <564249A3.3070901@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <564249A3.3070901@hpe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 646 Lines: 14 On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 02:46:43PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: > That is certainly fine. I was doing that originally, but then change it to > add an additional if. > > BTW, I have a process question. Should I just resend the patch 6 or should I > resend the whole series? I do have a couple of bugs in the (_Q_PENDING_BITS > != 8) part of the patch that I need to fix too. Just the one patch is fine. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/