Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:48:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:48:00 -0500 Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.133]:62877 "EHLO e35.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:47:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:48:27 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Cliff White cc: Chris Wedgwood , Alan Cox , Larry McVoy , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call Message-ID: <414510000.1046202507@flay> In-Reply-To: <200302251711.h1PHBct16624@mail.osdl.org> References: <200302251711.h1PHBct16624@mail.osdl.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 528 Lines: 16 > Interesting items for me are the fork/exec/sh times and some of the file > + VM numbers For the ones where you see degradation in fork/exec type stuff, any chance you could rerun them with 62-mjb3 with the objrmap stuff in it? That should fix a lot of the overhead. Thanks, M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/