Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752724AbbKKToy (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:44:54 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f45.google.com ([209.85.220.45]:33583 "EHLO mail-pa0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751708AbbKKTox (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:44:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:44:49 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Saurabh Sengar Cc: joe@perches.com, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, joern@lazybastard.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: phram: error handling Message-ID: <20151111194449.GH12143@google.com> References: <20151110194157.GS12143@google.com> <1447230238-3693-1-git-send-email-saurabh.truth@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1447230238-3693-1-git-send-email-saurabh.truth@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5189 Lines: 108 Hi Saurabh, On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:53:58PM +0530, Saurabh Sengar wrote: > Brian Norris wrote: > > Well, today you're in luck! You're touching a driver that requires no > > special hardware, so you should be able to test it. > > > I think you can try using the mem= kernel parameter (see > > Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt) to restrict your system memory, and > > then try using that unreachable portions of memory for phram. You can > > try this driver as either a module or built-in. For the former, you can > > specify the parameters during modprobe time, or later by writing to > > /sys/module/phram/parameters/phram. For the latter, you can specify on > > the kernel command line or in /sys/module/phram/parameters/phram. > > > Let me know if you have any more questions about testing your patch. > > > Hi Brian, > > As you have suggested I have restricted my laptop's memory to 1GB and tried to access unreachable portion of memory(2GB). > It seems to be successfully registered(this is OK right ?). Seems OK. > I have also tested below error scenarios; all exiting gracefully > - parameter too long > - too many arguments > - not enough arguments > - invalid start adddress > - invalid device length Nice! Glad to see you've tested quite a few good scenarios. > This is my first interaction with phram device so I request you to verify my testing. > Below are the commands and output I did for this testing. > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ cat /proc/meminfo | grep Mem > MemTotal: 1016588 kB > MemFree: 126016 kB > MemAvailable: 295508 kB > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ cat /proc/cmdline > BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.3.0-10333-gdfe4330-dirty mem=1024M root=UUID=2b66d4b2-ac21-4554-bf3b-64bc973e1dad ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 > > > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo insmod drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko phram=ram,2048Mi,1ki > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo dmesg -c > [ 634.748495] phram: ram device: 0x400 at 0x80000000 > > > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo insmod drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko phram=abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz,256Mi,1Mi > insmod: ERROR: could not insert module drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko: Invalid parameters > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo dmesg -c > [ 1469.763787] phram: parameter too long > [ 1469.763797] phram: `abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz,256Mi,1Mi' invalid for parameter `phram' > > > > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo insmod drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko phram=swap,256Mi,1Mi,extra_parameter > insmod: ERROR: could not insert module drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko: Invalid parameters > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo dmesg -c > [ 1650.081694] phram: too many arguments > [ 1650.081703] phram: `swap,256Mi,1Mi,extra_parameter' invalid for parameter `phram' > > > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo insmod drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko phram=swap,256Mi > insmod: ERROR: could not insert module drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko: Invalid parameters > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo dmesg -c > [ 1707.437130] phram: not enough arguments > [ 1707.437138] phram: `swap,256Mi' invalid for parameter `phram' > > > > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo insmod drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko phram=swap,256xyz,1Mi > insmod: ERROR: could not insert module drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko: Invalid parameters > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo dmesg -c > [ 1783.014351] phram: invalid start address > [ 1783.014359] phram: `swap,256xyz,1Mi' invalid for parameter `phram' > > > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo insmod drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko phram=swap,256Mi,1xyz > insmod: ERROR: could not insert module drivers/mtd/devices/phram.ko: Invalid parameters > saurabh@saurabh:~/little/Task02/linux$ sudo dmesg -c > [ 1831.746108] phram: invalid device length > [ 1831.746117] phram: `swap,256Mi,1xyz' invalid for parameter `phram' > ------------------------------------------- This all looks very good. For the successful cases, it might be nice to make sure you can still read and write the "device". (Try dd on /dev/mtd0, or see mtd-utils for tools like flash_erase.) But you're not touching the actual I/O behavior, so this isn't so important. More importantly, it's good to test these cases too: * phram is built-in (not a module), with and without a phram= line on the commandline * writing to /sys/module/phram/parameters/phram (for both the module and built-in cases) Thanks, Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/