Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S268458AbTBYVTW>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:19:22 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S268463AbTBYVTW>; Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:19:22 -0500
Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:50103 "EHLO holomorphy")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S268458AbTBYVTM>;
	Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:19:12 -0500
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:28:10 -0800
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
       Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
Message-ID: <20030225212810.GF10411@holomorphy.com>
Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20030222195642.GI1407@work.bitmover.com> <2080000.1045947731@[10.10.2.4]> <20030222231552.GA31268@work.bitmover.com> <3610000.1045957443@[10.10.2.4]> <20030224045616.GB4215@work.bitmover.com> <48940000.1046063797@[10.10.2.4]> <20030224065826.GA5665@work.bitmover.com> <1046093309.1246.6.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030225051956.GA18302@f00f.org> <13760000.1046153824@[10.10.2.4]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <13760000.1046153824@[10.10.2.4]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 654
Lines: 17

At some point in the past, Chris Wedgewood wrote:
>> It seems to me for small boxes, 2.5.x is margianlly slower at most
>> things than 2.4.x.

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:17:05PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Can you name a benchmark, or at least do something reproducible between
> versions, and produce a 2.4 vs 2.5 profile? Let's at least try to fix it ...

Looks like Cliff's got some good data.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/