From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
To: "'David Miller'" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        steve.glendinning@shawell.net
References: <006801d11b82$1f5704b0$5e050e10$@samsung.com>
 <20151110.115149.604622279273759756.davem@davemloft.net>
 <009b01d11c4f$57f6ef10$07e4cd30$@samsung.com>
 <20151111.111445.2097467355844936194.davem@davemloft.net>
In-reply-to: <20151111.111445.2097467355844936194.davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: RE: PING: [PATCH] net: smsc911x: Reset PHY during initialization
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:04:39 +0300
Message-id: <00fa01d11d18$666c28c0$33447a40$@samsung.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AQGNlvOQLk12RLtxbxMqxIJosf2yhwLNy61PAs+uWEsAzsa99Z7roCsw
Content-language: ru
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 958
Lines: 29

 Hello!

> >> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
> >
> >  I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
> > clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
> > break.
> 
> If I didn't reply it means I don't have anything constructive to say
> to you, and probably I'll end up agreeing with your analysis of the
> loopback test issue.
> 
> I'm not going to ask more than one more time for you to repost your
> patch.

 But, in this case, i don't have anything to change, do i? Or is it
just a formal requirement to RESEND? I can do this, if you want to.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/