Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754095AbbKLJVO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 04:21:14 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:35010 "EHLO mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753700AbbKLJVL (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 04:21:11 -0500 Message-ID: <564459FE.8020209@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:21:02 +0100 From: Jacek Anaszewski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingi Kim , Jacek Anaszewski CC: robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, sameo@linux.intel.com, lee.jones@linaro.org, rpurdie@rpsys.net, inki.dae@samsung.com, sw0312.kim@samsung.com, beomho.seo@samsung.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] leds: rt5033: Add RT5033 Flash led device driver References: <1447121864-15460-1-git-send-email-ingi2.kim@samsung.com> <1447121864-15460-3-git-send-email-ingi2.kim@samsung.com> <56421B8F.6010107@samsung.com> <56444681.9020604@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <56444681.9020604@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1793 Lines: 43 Hi Ingi, On 11/12/2015 08:57 AM, Ingi Kim wrote: [...] >>> + regmap_write(led->regmap, RT5033_REG_FLED_FUNCTION1, val); >>> + } else { >>> + regmap_update_bits(led->regmap, RT5033_REG_FLED_FUNCTION1, >>> + RT5033_FLED_FUNC1_MASK, RT5033_FLED_PINCTRL | >>> + rt5033_fled_used(led, fled_id)); >>> + regmap_update_bits(led->regmap, RT5033_REG_FLED_CTRL1, >>> + RT5033_FLED_CTRL1_MASK, >>> + (brightness - 1) << 4); >>> + regmap_update_bits(led->regmap, RT5033_REG_FLED_FUNCTION2, >>> + RT5033_FLED_FUNC2_MASK, RT5033_FLED_ENFLED); >>> + } >> >> How are you distinguishing between setting brightness for iout_joint >> case and for individual LEDs? Have you tested this use case? >> Even if you don't have a board with two separate LEDs, >> you should be able to test two LED class devices with a single >> connected LED. >> > > Thanks, I missed a iout_joint case :( > I have tested a board with integrated single LED, > It looks fine and all feature works well even if it has limitation. Please also test two separate LEDs case, by defining two child nodes in DT, and in a result you will get two LED class devices. After that you can set brightness separately for each LED class device, and you'll be able to verify that the driver works properly by observing the single LED connected to both outputs. In order to make the testing even more valuable, you can set triggers for both LEDs -- Best Regards, Jacek Anaszewski -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/