From: "Scott Robert Ladd" <scott@coyotegulch.com>
To: "Hans Reiser" <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: "Steven Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com>,
       "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
       "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Larry McVoy" <lm@bitmover.com>
Subject: RE: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 19:19:55 -0500
Message-ID: <FKEAJLBKJCGBDJJIPJLJAEANFAAA.scott@coyotegulch.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <3E5BFF10.50105@namesys.com>
Importance: Normal
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2039
Lines: 46

Hans Reiser wrote
> Now it is games that hardware is too slow for.  After games, maybe AI
> assistants?....  Will you be saying, "My AI doesn't have enough
> horsepower to run on, its databases are small and out of date, and it is
> providing me worse advice than my wealthy friends get, and providing it
> later."?  How much will you pay for a good AI to advise you?  (I really
> like my I-Nav GPS adviser in my mini-van.... money well spent....)

Really good AI is predicated on the invention of better algorithms. I do a
bit of work in this area; we're a long way from any useful AI -- unless you
think Microsoft's "Clippy" qualifies. :)

I would love to see "intelligence" in software; IBM's recent "autonomic
computing" initiative is marketing hype for a good idea. Programs (including
Linux!) should be self-diagnosing, fault tolerant, and self-correcting.
We're not there yet on the software side (again).

And "smart AI" may not be something people want. Many people distrust
machines -- and in gaming, a really good AI simply isn't as important (or
desirable) as are pretty graphics (handled by a GPU).

> Ok, you win that one.;-)

Yeah! ;)

> It is interesting that games are the only compelling motivation for
> faster desktop hardware these days.  It may be part of why we are in a
> tech bust.  When AIs become hardware purchase drivers, there will likely
> be a boom again.

I've worked with several game companies; AI just isn't a priority. Games
need to be "good enough" to challenge average gamers; people who want a real
challenge play online against other humans.

Excellent breast physics (Extreme Beach Volleyball) sells games; a crafty,
hard-to-defeat AI actually turns off casual players and just isn't "sexy".

And now I think we're getting *WAY* off topic. :)

..Scott

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/