Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:33:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:33:23 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:40633 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:33:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 21:42:40 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Bernd Eckenfels Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call Message-ID: <20030226054240.GL10411@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Bernd Eckenfels , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 772 Lines: 20 In article <...> someone wrote: >> unfortunantly for them the core CPU speeds became uncoupled from the >> memory speeds and skyrocketed up to the point where CISC cores are as fast >> or faster then the 'high speed' RISC cores. On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:30:50AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hmm.. are there any RISC Cores which run even closely to CISC Speeds? > And why not? Is this only the financial power of Intel? There is one other: x86 binary compatibility. Looks like the beginning and end of it to me. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/