Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:58:48 -0800
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: clean up the kbuild tree?
Message-ID: <20151115175848.GD10150@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
References: <20151115112705.0bf4f0ed@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151115112705.0bf4f0ed@canb.auug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 626
Lines: 16

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:27:05AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> I notice that the kbuild tree (relative to Linus' tree) only contains
> lots of merges and these 2 commits from April 2014:

Really should get in that patch officially. I have a variety of users.
And it clearly has been tested long enough in linux-next :)
Michal, enough to just repost it?

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/