Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:13:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:13:56 -0500 Received: from palrel12.hp.com ([156.153.255.237]:63401 "EHLO palrel12.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:13:54 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:22:15 -0800 To: Horst von Brand Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Invalid compilation without -fno-strict-aliasing Message-ID: <20030226172215.GB3731@bougret.hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: jt@hpl.hp.com References: <20030225234646.GB30611@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <200302261538.h1QFcAiF004085@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302261538.h1QFcAiF004085@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. E-mail: jt@hpl.hp.com From: Jean Tourrilhes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1612 Lines: 40 On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 04:38:10PM +0100, Horst von Brand wrote: > Jean Tourrilhes said: > > It looks like a compiler bug to me... > > Some users have complained that when the following code is > > compiled without the -fno-strict-aliasing, the order of the write and > > memcpy is inverted (which mean a bogus len is mem-copied into the > > stream). > > Code (from linux/include/net/iw_handler.h) : > > -------------------------------------------- > > static inline char * > > iwe_stream_add_event(char * stream, /* Stream of events */ > > char * ends, /* End of stream */ > > struct iw_event *iwe, /* Payload */ > > int event_len) /* Real size of payload */ > > { > > /* Check if it's possible */ > > if((stream + event_len) < ends) { > > iwe->len = event_len; > > memcpy(stream, (char *) iwe, event_len); > > stream += event_len; > > } > > return stream; > > } > > -------------------------------------------- > > IMHO, the compiler should have enough context to know that the > > reordering is dangerous. Any suggestion to make this simple code more > > bullet proof is welcomed. > > The compiler is free to assume char *stream and struct iw_event *iwe point > to separate areas of memory, due to strict aliasing. Which is true and which is not the problem I'm complaining about. Have fun... Jean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/