Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:15:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:15:04 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:24963 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:14:25 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:24:32 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Marc-Christian Petersen , Dave McCracken , Andrew Morton cc: zilvinas@gemtek.lt, helgehaf@aitel.hist.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.62-mm3] objrmap fix for X Message-ID: <16000000.1046283871@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <200302261903.17122.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> References: <20030223230023.365782f3.akpm@digeo.com> <40780000.1046240068@[10.10.2.4]> <14910000.1046281932@[10.10.2.4]> <200302261903.17122.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 636 Lines: 15 >> Pah. Debian stealth-upgraded me to gcc 3.2 ... no wonder it's slow as a >> dog. So your patch is stable, and works just fine. Sorry, > hmm, you mean gcc 3.2 compilations are slow as dog? gcc 2.95.x is better? Yeah, about 1.5x difference. See the whole thread on that where I posted more numbers a week or two ago (though that bit was right down at the end of the first email, IIRC). M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/