Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753021AbbKPQay (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:30:54 -0500 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:60067 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752689AbbKPQau (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:30:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 16:30:16 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Liviu Dudau Cc: Mark Yao , Heiko Stuebner , Philipp Zabel , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Eric Anholt , linux-rockchip , LAKML , dri-devel , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/rockchip: Convert the probe function to the generic drm_of_component_probe() Message-ID: <20151116163016.GO8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1447685093-26129-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1447685093-26129-3-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1447685093-26129-3-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1762 Lines: 67 I've tweaked your patch to make the above (buggy) change a little clearer. On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 02:44:53PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > - for (i = 0;; i++) { > - port = of_parse_phandle(np, "ports", i); > - if (!port) > - break; > - > - if (!of_device_is_available(port->parent)) { > - of_node_put(port); > - continue; > - } > > - component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port->parent); > - of_node_put(port); > - } > -static int compare_of(struct device *dev, void *data) > -{ > - struct device_node *np = data; > - > - return dev->of_node == np; > -} The original above passes port->parent to component_match_add(). This means 'np' in the above compare_of() function is 'port->parent'. This means the above comparison is effectively: dev->of_node == port->parent The generic code instead does this: component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port); So what we get in the comparison function is 'port' rather than 'port->parent': > +static int compare_port(struct device *dev, void *data) > { > + struct device_node *np = data; > + return dev->parent->of_node == np; > +} which means the comparison is: dev->parent->of_node == port which is a different comparison from the above. You instead want this to be: return dev->of_node == np->parent; Heiko, please test the above change to compare_port() - I think you'll find that will fix your issue. Thanks. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/