Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753180AbbKPRsk (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:48:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:35798 "EHLO mail-wm0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752464AbbKPRse (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:48:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151116174321.GR8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1447685093-26129-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1447685093-26129-2-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <20151116162241.GN8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151116164907.GA4158@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20151116172248.GP8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151116174321.GR8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:48:32 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports. From: Daniel Stone To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Liviu Dudau , linux-rockchip , Daniel Vetter , LKML , dri-devel , LAKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1902 Lines: 57 On 16 November 2015 at 17:43, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: >> On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux >> wrote: >> > Please sensibly wrap your messages. Your lines are longer than 80 >> > characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply >> > to your very very very very very very very very very very very very >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very >> > very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting >> > them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that >> > kind of additional work? Thanks. >> >> His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters. >> You should probably look into fixing your MUA. > > No. > > Standard net etiquette is that email should be wrapped around 72 > characters to give space for reply indentation to remain readable > on an 80 column screen. Most of my email replies are written on an > 80 column screen. Oh, I just thought there was a greater reason for your 660-character tantrum than someone overshooting by 14 characters on a couple of lines. Then again, having read the rest of the pointlessly hostile mail, it's entirely in keeping with the rest. Shame that your needless aggression obscures a fairly valid point. Have a lovely even ing . -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/