Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753125AbbKPRx7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:53:59 -0500 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:60411 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752406AbbKPRx5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:53:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:53:48 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Daniel Stone Cc: Liviu Dudau , linux-rockchip , Daniel Vetter , LKML , dri-devel , LAKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports. Message-ID: <20151116175348.GU8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1447685093-26129-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <1447685093-26129-2-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> <20151116162241.GN8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151116164907.GA4158@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20151116172248.GP8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20151116174321.GR8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2075 Lines: 43 On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:48:32PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > On 16 November 2015 at 17:43, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 05:32:05PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote: > >> On 16 November 2015 at 17:22, Russell King - ARM Linux > >> wrote: > >> > Please sensibly wrap your messages. Your lines are longer than 80 > >> > characters which makes it exceedingly difficult for some people to reply > >> > to your very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very very very very very very very very very > >> > very very very very very very long lines without first reformatting > >> > them manually - and why should they bother to reply if they have that > >> > kind of additional work? Thanks. > >> > >> His lines are wrapped mostly at 80, but sometimes at 86, characters. > >> You should probably look into fixing your MUA. > > > > No. > > > > Standard net etiquette is that email should be wrapped around 72 > > characters to give space for reply indentation to remain readable > > on an 80 column screen. Most of my email replies are written on an > > 80 column screen. > > Oh, I just thought there was > a greater reason for your > 660-character tantrum Sorry, I've stopped reading at this point, at the point where you start slinging crap around. If you have a serious point to make, maybe you could grow up in the next five minutes and write a proper email, thanks. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/