Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752066AbbKPXln (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:41:43 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:13733 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750967AbbKPXlm (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:41:42 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,304,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="687040205" Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:40:46 -0800 From: Jacob Pan To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , John Stultz , LKML , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , Rafael Wysocki , Eduardo Valentin , Paul Turner , Josh Triplett , jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] timer: relax tick stop in idle entry Message-ID: <20151116154046.3e40c2cb@icelake> In-Reply-To: <564A6796.9090409@linux.intel.com> References: <1447444387-23525-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <1447444387-23525-3-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20151113142438.3144d47d@icelake> <20151116135126.5a50e45d@icelake> <20151116223117.GK5184@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20151116151503.47cbd4cf@icelake> <20151116232837.GN5184@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <564A6796.9090409@linux.intel.com> Organization: OTC X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1097 Lines: 24 On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 15:32:38 -0800 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 11/16/2015 3:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Is this mostly an special-purpose embedded thing, or do you expect > > distros to be enabling this? If the former, I suggest > > , but if distros are doing this for > > general-purpose workloads, I instead suggest CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ. > > thermal overload happens a lot on small devices, but sadly also in > big datacenters where it is not uncommon to underprovision cooling > capacity by a bit (it's one of those "99% of the time you only need > THIS much, the 1% you need 30% more" and that more is expensive or > even impractical) CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ is more inline with idle injection in that both are targeted energy efficiency. Checking ubuntu and fedora, seems both have CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL=y. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/