Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:32:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:32:42 -0500 Received: from ppp0.ocs.com.au ([203.34.97.3]:25357 "HELO mail.ocs.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 16:32:31 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 From: Keith Owens To: Christoph Hellwig cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Rumpf Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.1-ac15 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:25:39 BST." <200102191325.OAA12026@ns.caldera.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:32:23 +1100 Message-ID: <32524.982618343@ocs3.ocs-net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 14:25:39 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >You just reinvented the read-copy-update model >(http://www.rdrop.com/users/paulmck/rclock/intro/rclock_intro.html)... > >The mail proposing that locking model for module unloading is not yet >in the arvhices, sorry. I did not reinvent it, I was following up on the discussion we already had off list about using this model. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/