Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752050AbbKQFDy (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:03:54 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:54664 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751864AbbKQFDx (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:03:53 -0500 X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:04:03 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Josh Triplett , Jacob Pan , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , John Stultz , LKML , Srinivas Pandruvada , Len Brown , Rafael Wysocki , Eduardo Valentin , Paul Turner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] timer: relax tick stop in idle entry Message-ID: <20151117050403.GQ5184@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1447444387-23525-3-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20151113142438.3144d47d@icelake> <20151116135126.5a50e45d@icelake> <20151116223210.GA21522@cloud> <20151116232640.GM5184@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20151117014103.GA6629@x> <20151117025342.GP5184@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <564A978A.8060905@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <564A978A.8060905@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15111705-8236-0000-0000-0000139C16DD Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 821 Lines: 19 On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:57:14PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On 11/16/2015 6:53 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >Fair point. When in the five-jiffy throttling state, what can wake up > >a CPU? In an earlier version of this proposal, the answer was "nothing", > >but maybe that has changed. > > device interrupts are likely to wake the cpus. OK, that I cannot help you with. But presumably if the interrupt handler does a wakeup (or similar), that is deferred to the end of the throttling interval? Timers are also deferred, including hrtimers? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/