Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/drivers/tango-xtal: Replace code by
 clocksource_mmio_init
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1447412292-841-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
 <5645D5A0.1000502@sigmadesigns.com> <564B1C1C.7070801@linaro.org>
From: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
Message-ID: <564B222E.5080209@sigmadesigns.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:48:46 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/41.0 SeaMonkey/2.38
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <564B1C1C.7070801@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1839
Lines: 47

On 17/11/2015 13:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/13/2015 01:20 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
>> On 13/11/2015 11:58, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>>> The current code to initialize, register and read the clocksource is
>>> already factored out in mmio.c via the clocksource_mmio_init function.
>>>
>>> Factor out the code with the clocksource_mmio_init function.
>>
>> The reason I didn't like clocksource_mmio_init() is because it exports
>> 4 generic accessors.
>>
>> I guess this function makes more sense when all platforms are using it,
>> in an ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM kernel. (Also the accessors are probably quite
>> small, so the waste is probably minimal.)
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> it is not clear for me if you agree with this patch or not. Can you 
> clarify ?

[ Adding rmk as the original mmio.c author ]

Hello Daniel,

It's hard to give a straight answer. From my limited perspective (building
a kernel for Sigma boards only) I feel that mmio.c brings nothing. (As you
mentioned, it would be interesting to measure whether having reg_base in
the ctx, rather than as a global is better or worse for perf, though the
actual difference may be lost in the noise.)

On the other hand, I can see how a different perspective, such as yours,
may see benefits in having all drivers use the same APIs; and there may
be other savings for ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM builds with lots of platforms.

I guess if you think it is a good patch, I will defer to your experience.

I just wish Thomas would take a look at my mmio patch. I will make an
official submission, so that it can be properly shot down :-)

Regards.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/