Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:39:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:39:06 -0500 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.202]:4083 "EHLO TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:39:05 -0500 To: jw schultz Cc: Linux-kernel Subject: Re: About /etc/mtab and /proc/mounts References: <20030219112111.GD130@DervishD> <3E5C8682.F5929A04@daimi.au.dk> <3E5DB2CA.32539D41@daimi.au.dk> <3E5DCB89.9086582F@daimi.au.dk> <20030227092121.GG15254@pegasys.ws> Reply-To: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop From: Miles Bader Date: 27 Feb 2003 18:49:16 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20030227092121.GG15254@pegasys.ws> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 730 Lines: 14 jw schultz writes: > /etc/mtab is a hack. I suspect it was done so that fsck, df > and umount wouldn't have to read /dev/kmem. We now have > much better ways to get data out of the kernel. Oh, I very much agree. I'm just trying to say that it's not really any worse than the _other_ stupid hacks being suggested... I think making /proc/{mount,mtab,...,whatever} work correctly is certainly the best thing to do. -Miles -- "1971 pickup truck; will trade for guns" - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/