Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932626AbbKQXr2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:47:28 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:48218 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754734AbbKQXrS (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:47:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:47:16 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Christoph Hellwig , Daniel Baluta , jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, knaack.h@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, octavian.purdila@intel.com, pebolle@tiscali.nl, patrick.porlan@intel.com, adriana.reus@intel.com, constantin.musca@intel.com, marten@intuitiveaerial.com, cristina.opriceana@gmail.com, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation Message-Id: <20151117154716.48f5a2955b2ce4422dcbc763@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <564860CC.7000206@kernel.org> References: <1445614411-533-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@intel.com> <1445614411-533-2-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@intel.com> <20151110065126.GA20339@lst.de> <20151110131237.894356c2ba17d8e9231509db@linux-foundation.org> <564860CC.7000206@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1974 Lines: 48 On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 +0000 Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > > > On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig > >> wrote: > >> > >>> is this simple addition something you could still send on to Linus > >>> for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in > >>> so I could start using it in patches for various trees in the next > >>> merge window. > >> > >> It's super late, but the configfs changes are obviously safe to > >> existing code. > >> > >> What about the IIO changes? Will someone be merging them for 4.5-rc1, > >> or something else? > > Yes. I'll take the IIO bits and ultimately they'll go through Greg KH for the 4.5 > > merge window. > > > Hi Andrew, > > Just taken a quick look at your mmotm list and see this ended up in the > mainline later group (fair enough given the timing!). > As such shall we fall back to plan b) a special git branch pulled into the trees > of anyone who cares? > > I'll base such a tree on some obvious point in Linus' tree (either 4.4 or 4.5-rc1) > That way I can get the IIO stuff queued up asap and we can build on that going > forward during this cycle. I plan to send configfs-allow-dynamic-group-creation.patch to Linus this week. I'll retain iio-core-introduce-iio-configfs-support.patch iio-core-introduce-iio-software-triggers.patch iio-core-introduce-iio-software-triggers-fix.patch iio-trigger-introduce-iio-hrtimer-based-trigger.patch iio-documentation-add-iio-configfs-documentation.patch with a view to dropping them once I see them turn up in linux-next. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/