Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754948AbbKRHea (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 02:34:30 -0500 Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk ([178.18.118.26]:38998 "EHLO saturn.retrosnub.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752477AbbKRHe2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 02:34:28 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <20151117154716.48f5a2955b2ce4422dcbc763@linux-foundation.org> References: <1445614411-533-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@intel.com> <1445614411-533-2-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@intel.com> <20151110065126.GA20339@lst.de> <20151110131237.894356c2ba17d8e9231509db@linux-foundation.org> <564860CC.7000206@kernel.org> <20151117154716.48f5a2955b2ce4422dcbc763@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] configfs: Allow dynamic group creation From: Jonathan Cameron Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:33:57 +0000 To: Andrew Morton , Jonathan Cameron CC: Christoph Hellwig , Daniel Baluta , jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de, knaack.h@gmx.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, octavian.purdila@intel.com, pebolle@tiscali.nl, patrick.porlan@intel.com, adriana.reus@intel.com, constantin.musca@intel.com, marten@intuitiveaerial.com, cristina.opriceana@gmail.com, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <01253AE7-7798-46ED-B3E4-A2540E577D47@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2225 Lines: 68 On 17 November 2015 23:47:16 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 +0000 Jonathan Cameron >wrote: > >> On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton > wrote: >> >> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> is this simple addition something you could still send on to >Linus >> >>> for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in >> >>> so I could start using it in patches for various trees in the >next >> >>> merge window. >> >> >> >> It's super late, but the configfs changes are obviously safe to >> >> existing code. >> >> >> >> What about the IIO changes? Will someone be merging them for >4.5-rc1, >> >> or something else? >> > Yes. I'll take the IIO bits and ultimately they'll go through Greg >KH for the 4.5 >> > merge window. >> > >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Just taken a quick look at your mmotm list and see this ended up in >the >> mainline later group (fair enough given the timing!). >> As such shall we fall back to plan b) a special git branch pulled >into the trees >> of anyone who cares? >> >> I'll base such a tree on some obvious point in Linus' tree (either >4.4 or 4.5-rc1) >> That way I can get the IIO stuff queued up asap and we can build on >that going >> forward during this cycle. > >I plan to send configfs-allow-dynamic-group-creation.patch to Linus >this week. I'll retain > >iio-core-introduce-iio-configfs-support.patch >iio-core-introduce-iio-software-triggers.patch >iio-core-introduce-iio-software-triggers-fix.patch >iio-trigger-introduce-iio-hrtimer-based-trigger.patch >iio-documentation-add-iio-configfs-documentation.patch > >with a view to dropping them once I see them turn up in linux-next. That's great. Thanks. Jonathan -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/