Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:27:42 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, lkp@01.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [x86, perf] 7aba70e47c: BUG: unable to handle kernel
 paging request at 696d2f62
Message-ID: <20151118162742.GH3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <87fv03u89v.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87fv03u89v.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1238
Lines: 24

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 02:33:00PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git perf/core
> commit 7aba70e47ca4e961acb5af96d5127e3fad651c7c ("x86, perf: Optimize stack walk user accesses")

Of course, that commit no longer exists. I re-create the tree every time
I push it, this means that if you report something a few days later, its
highly likely its against non-existant commits :/

> [   21.984049] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 696d2f62
> [   21.986759] IP: [<4110c023>] perf_prepare_sample+0xcc/0x51d
> [   21.987859] *pdpt = 0000000001a93001 *pde = 0000000000000000 
> [   21.988015] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT 
> [   21.988015] Modules linked in:
> [   21.988015] CPU: 0 PID: 496 Comm: trinity-main Not tainted 4.3.0-01147-g7aba70e #1

That doesn't actually look like something the fingered patch touches.
And seeing how its trinity triggering it, I suspect bisection fail.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/