Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:17:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:17:11 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:41906 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:17:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:22:25 -0600 (CST) From: ajoshi@kernel.crashing.org To: Ben Collins cc: Adrian Bunk , Marcelo Tosatti , lkml , trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.21-pre5 In-Reply-To: <20030227124002.GA21100@phunnypharm.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1209 Lines: 44 Just for the record, the patch I sent to Marcelo did _NOT_ include any 1394 hunks in it. Marcelo must have accidently mixed mine up with some old 1394 tree. ani On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Ben Collins wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 09:32:39AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 03:14:44AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > So here goes -pre5. > > > > > > > > > Summary of changes from v2.4.21-pre4 to v2.4.21-pre5 > > > ============================================ > > > > > > : > > > o rivafb 0.9.4 update > > >... > > > > WTF is this??? > > > > Besides the rivafb update it reverts parts of the IEEE 1394 patches that > > were included in -pre4. > > Yes, please revert this, and then make sure _my_ patch gets into -pre6? > > -- > Debian - http://www.debian.org/ > Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ > Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ > Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/