Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933629AbbKRXUj (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:20:39 -0500 Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:46067 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932085AbbKRXUg (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:20:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 23:20:29 +0000 From: Luis Henriques To: Ben Hutchings Cc: Willy Tarreau , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Trond Myklebust , "Kornievskaia, Olga" Subject: Re: [stable] Failing to send a CLOSE if file is opened WRONLY and server reboots on a 4.x mount Message-ID: <20151118232029.GA10848@charon> References: <20150912225608.380720062@1wt.eu> <4804EB4C-FCAE-49A7-9075-4C63D72F9AA9@netapp.com> <20150915053741.GB29285@1wt.eu> <7E69BA76-E3DF-4389-A8C4-F23C9E1FD5CC@netapp.com> <55D3ECC9-EC69-469F-AD46-EE3818F3D138@netapp.com> <20150916053333.GC29588@1wt.eu> <1447548801.17039.19.camel@decadent.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1447548801.17039.19.camel@decadent.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1427 Lines: 37 On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:53:21AM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 07:33 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hi Olga, > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 02:36:06PM +0000, Kornievskaia, Olga wrote: > > > > > > Hi Willy, > > > > > > After checking with the list, I believe the course of action will be to > > > correct the patch with the patch below instead of reverting it. > > > > OK but as far as I can tell, mainline is still not fixed regarding this > > issue. I can't introduce in a stable branch a fix which is not yet in > > mainline. Thus I'll simply remove the patch from this series and will > > merge both patches in a future series once your fix reaches mainline. > > > > Note that I picked this fix from 3.2 (commit ef8500b18fc4bb) so my > > understanding is that this patch needs to be reverted from 3.2 as well > > for the time being ? > > > > Thanks very much for the detailed investigations! > > The second patch is now in mainline as commit > a41cbe86df3afbc82311a1640e20858c0cd7e065, and appears to be needed on > all stable branches since they all got the previous incorrect patch. > Thanks, queuing it for the 3.16 kernel. Cheers, -- Lu?s -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/