Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933980AbbKSNdP (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:33:15 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:51069 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752599AbbKSNdN (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 08:33:13 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Andreas Schwab , pinskia@gmail.com, Prasun.Kapoor@caviumnetworks.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, agraf@suse.de, klimov.linux@gmail.com, Yury Norov , jan.dakinevich@gmail.com, joseph@codesourcery.com, ddaney.cavm@gmail.com, bamvor.zhangjian@huawei.com, philipp.tomsich@theobroma-systems.com, andrey.konovalov@linaro.org, christoph.muellner@theobroma-systems.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/19] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:32:16 +0100 Message-ID: <3771653.pOZ6XkUXAn@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1447795019-30176-1-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> <3754277.KmO9Nk3XLD@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3g6gErI8dIrZ4b5gZA5K2DmJw5LYIo+dkRDZc0PoU1JO8vFyfNi siFSJOrPkICYkGdPsXPwfL1UKQZLkEOUd9YUR9Ect+TQmDfuNltE+oFA//pXB25FZUtq07H xGXcDK5hk5kaxZ00AvsTFjyshclSxdisY9n2+IbgzEC9CXR44Em6tY8Sp/Hht4f9Y0yNREr t8MYk5pmkJFMlOu3DViGg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:hkCKFyRQ7Jg=:8/8A49Q9/e7apfoEcycJIn tRGvI41dlUA9LbKUbUnFp+R8X0c2XuOJp1+v/Lxj+YRXB8kMVkCM928rqeGIHL4VCh0Ywy82x OvuIk/HDyYRgZHJhCgnFM2B5+3FxA2HhEgaLHuRBJW6ejv6+LcgYCfsuKUJefuYrGeLJfAL/g SXife7XMSq9YbYfEWz+9nH4eva0lm5wWQKuw6u6IB/KC92l/6xnMXKkM6y4WLLOgSpuP/XESL FWDQjV99J8kt7QXARCrCL3nuTN54PWeQRyNaXjF/y+9cnBWqAeyMtBnB8BDYwr0/21WCLLHpS 4MOtv7ZB9y9wGNuW9vhF0yE6Q4yoGKSk+9WDWjXtrduCFQWf96a3Vj1x1svS8kEaA+oNfEEXe zQKCDkd1GM850+/eDQL4WUFcahdsZe14JG0XPQPCEj+X9BZaq5Iiyzl1Sgp1xf9/EnoIzpeiY 6I43Yh/xp0mJRUMeGrhFK1zOMi76IpnsuQE7Iw3hWIQkYLG//KsT6no9q0czSVGS55tWU/PTw 4Y9LjWaKFxw1bFlgFnuV2oY2zz/kONnWCuhfnp/WvN3UtZt32NWKs6g+1Fen/Jw3E4TwXzcCh ymWNQR0pvJ+x/o6Jd82G+eRsvuRAO3Q+wdbkF6Or+kb4EogpVfZjNxx1EYAhmWreZl/VsESIp KvihBDSosHyxH+B5iHDc4DLFHU3l8mZy37ENeZidlFmaSq/5tHIezQVaqkAFmm/GWfJsYiCec 7nkoG0CAryCXVtVT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 704 Lines: 19 On Thursday 19 November 2015 14:21:16 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Arnd Bergmann writes: > > > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 00:16:54 Yury Norov wrote: > >> +#define sys_lseek sys_llseek > > > > This seems pointless, as there is no sys_lseek > > I think it should be the other way round. Why would you want to use > llseek if you can pass loff_t in a single register? Right, it makes more sense the other way round. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/