Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758981AbbKSRop (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:44:45 -0500 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]:17319 "EHLO eusmtp01.atmel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758805AbbKSRom (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:44:42 -0500 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 4.4 #1 To: Arnd Bergmann References: <1447760158-20204-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <5616576.CPP4uTUkOp@wuerfel> CC: Olof Johansson , , Linux Kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , Alexandre Belloni , Boris BREZILLON , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Ludovic Desroches From: Nicolas Ferre X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Organization: atmel Message-ID: <564E0A99.9020707@atmel.com> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:44:57 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5616576.CPP4uTUkOp@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.161.30.18] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1992 Lines: 44 Le 19/11/2015 16:22, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit : > On Tuesday 17 November 2015 12:35:58 Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> Arnd, Olof, Kevin, >> >> This is the first "fixes" pull-request for AT91. I tried to collect little >> patches that didn't make it for -rc1. >> It can be due to synchronization between trees like the addition of some >> sama5d2 Xplained nodes (MFD tree) or the change of the watchdog compatible >> string for sama5d4 (watchdog tree). >> It can also be due to trivial cleanups that were spotted or submitted late like >> the replacement of "wakeup" properties or removal of unneeded defconfig option. >> The removal of some dead legacy DT properties or nodes is, in my opinion worth >> it as well in order to prevent us from abusive cut'n paste. >> NAND and ISI Atmel MAINTAINERS entries are also updated. >> >> Tell me if it's okay for you. > > I'd be happier to get the patches late in the process and then push back > myself than to get them as fixes, there was really no reason to wait > for the merge window to end with the ones that you already had. I thought than having a precise milestone as a base for this pull-request would be preferred. > None of the changes look too invasive for -rc2, so I'm taking it anyway, > but please try to let us know what you have earlier next time, so we > can get the first fixes into the merge window, or add them as late > additions on the branches before sending the main pull requests. > > Inter-tree dependencies should never be a reason to send stuff after > -rc1, let's talk about that before the merge window if you know you > have those. Sure, the communication in advance with you would have make all this easier, sorry for not having done this. Thanks Arnd. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/