Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934734AbbKSXcM (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:32:12 -0500 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:58138 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934629AbbKSXcL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:32:11 -0500 X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:29:22 -0800 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu To: "Wangnan (F)" Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , ast@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Add bpf-output event Message-ID: <20151119232922.GB15042@us.ibm.com> References: <20151118192603.GA374@us.ibm.com> <20151118205039.GX22729@kernel.org> <20151118231437.GA78885@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> <564D27C3.4020200@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <564D27C3.4020200@huawei.com> X-Operating-System: Linux 2.0.32 on an i486 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15111923-0021-0000-0000-000014A751ED Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1983 Lines: 46 Wangnan (F) [wangnan0@huawei.com] wrote: | | | On 2015/11/19 7:14, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: | >On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:50:39PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: | >>Em Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:26:04AM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu escreveu: | >>>>From 8f71d55dd3e27e6ca2138e3ed6dfeceb1c00a426 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | >>>From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu | >>>Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:06:08 -0500 | >>>Subject: [PATCH] perf test: Add bpf-output event | >>> | >>>The kernel has added support for 'PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT' but that is | >>>missing from the perf tool. Among other things, results in the 'roundtrip | >>>evsel->name check' test case of 'perf test' failing on Powerpc. | >>Next time can you please state if this is for this merge window or for | >>the next? | >> | >>Will apply it for perf/core, for the next merge window. | >wait a sec, I believe Wang has posted an RFC a month ago that adds support | >for this properly instead of simply shutting up the error. | | Yes. Please have a look at | | http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1446029705-199659-3-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com | | and patch 23/31 - 31/31 in | | http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1444826502-49291-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com | | We are working on a solution which truly utilizes bpf-output, including | filling event array and extracting BPF output through perf data to CTF | format. Now they are separated in multiple patchset, and I'd like to | resend them to Arnaldo in this week. Ok. It looked like there was development going on around BPF so I put in the stubs to avoid false positives in the perf test. There is a BPF filter test case that is also getting Skipped. Would this patchset address that too? Sukadev -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/