Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:29:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:29:19 -0500 Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp ([210.143.35.51]:32131 "EHLO TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:29:18 -0500 To: miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: About /etc/mtab and /proc/mounts References: <200302271600.h1RG0Cdh011948@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> <3E5E6B39.3DD1C6A@daimi.au.dk> <200302272213.h1RMDQJT017937@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <3E5E91B2.8EACF7D0@daimi.au.dk> Reply-To: Miles Bader System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Blat: Foop From: Miles Bader Date: 28 Feb 2003 10:37:35 +0900 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 905 Lines: 18 miquels@cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) writes: > So why not mount rootfs on '//', mount the real rootfilesystem > on //root, then chroot to //root (while keeping it possible to > chdir("//") ). Because it's _extremely_ common for `//...' to be generated by tools constructing pathnames, when what's really meant is `/...' (which is fine, because normally it makes no difference). > Apollo/DomainOS had this '//' thing, used for something different > (it was the equivalent of their /net autofs mountpoint) but it > worked quite well and didn't get in the way of normal '/' operation. Really? I'm skeptical... -Miles -- I'd rather be consing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/