Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162939AbbKTS7T (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:59:19 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:33935 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1162214AbbKTS7R (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:59:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:59:12 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20151120.135912.1506496112678349111.davem@davemloft.net> To: tj@kernel.org Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, kaber@trash.net, kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, lizefan@huawei.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, daniel@iogearbox.net, daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de, nhorman@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2] netfilter, cgroup: implement xt_cgroup2 match From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1447959171-20749-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> References: <1447959171-20749-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:59:16 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1115 Lines: 29 From: Tejun Heo Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 13:52:44 -0500 > This is the second take of the xt_cgroup2 patchset. Changes from the > last take are > > * Instead of adding sock->sk_cgroup separately, sock->sk_cgrp_data now > carries either (prioidx, classid) pair or cgroup2 pointer. This > avoids inflating struct sock with yet another cgroup related field. > Unfortunately, this does add some complexity but that's the > trade-off and the complexity is contained in cgroup proper. > > * Various small updats as per David and Jan's reviews. I like this a lot better, thanks. Please address Daniel's feedback on patch #6 and then I'm personally fine with this series. Pablo, are you ok with me merging this into net-next directly or would you rather I take patches 1-6 into net-next and then you can merge and then add patch #7 on top? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/